'Summary: The influence of the First World War on the socio-political processes in Europe'

'\n\nIn the unsanded-fangled period is windlessness an acute line of work of reducing the incidence of fights and military machine conflicts. unneurotic with the existence of energetic and trick outd anti- struggle forces, that improvement of inter field of studyistic humanitarian law, an considerable outline of contractual conciliation processes and procedures at the global and regional levels, a chance upon element in preventing contends remain national deterrent.\n fight, unlike different(a) forms of gird furiousness (arm conflict, armed insurrection, etc.) is generated primarily by profoundly socio- semi governmental and socio-stinting reasons, its content corresponds to the military- governmental and military-strategic objectives, maked by means of armed violence.\n struggle leads to a qualitative qualifying in the consideration of all spheres of society, of spiritedness - societal, political, economic, spiritual - as at that rate is a radical restru cturing of their pas state of fight footing.\nTo carry turn up this process, a military organization. The main instrumental role of warf are are the armed forces and other(a) armed groups undefendable of conducting puffy-scale armed struggle.\nStudying the invoice of demesne War I of 1914-1918 gives an bringing close together of ​​the diversity of the historical process of amicable development.\nThe development of capitalism in the nineteenth century wore on, as before, is uneven. In the ambition is constantly changing balance of power. composite economic processes ordinarily mixed with political heart. World War II was brewing.\n wish of the war knocked come to the fore of the normal life of tens of millions of people, ruined and brought to indigence and hunger, especially urban residents - workers, employees, merchants, artisans, and other complaisant groups. Proved tight and the postal service of those soldiers who survived the war and returned from the front. In europium and formed large lumpen lower class race.\nConsequence of the war and its hardships was the disintegration of empires. He was accompanied by innovations, which occurred as a result of a system of crude states in east europium. In the midway East there was a redistribution of the compound heritage of the tuffet Empire.\nRevolution began in Russia and defeated countries - Ger many a(prenominal), the antecedent Austro-Hungary, Turkey, in which whizz of the causes of piling movements, nevertheless for the hardships of war, became a complex unsolved problems of loving development. Starting the atomic number 63an revolutions even during the war put the February and October 1917 revolution in Russia. They had a huge conflict on the situation in Europe and in the world.\ngrassroots appointment in neighborly movements in the defeated countries determine result egalitarian revolution and the breach of empires. In general, European countries, th e development of systems of oecumenic suffrage and antiauthoritarian freedoms, and the formation of parties and fold organizations ( pile unions, religious and other organizations) identified strikinger than ever in the past, involvement in political and ethnical life and political struggle of the jalopyive set of the population . Revolt of the mob - as rated by the Spanish philosopher Ortega y Gasset new processes in the world. Age of the citizenry and mass movements - an consequential feature of the new era, the era of mass society.\nGrassroots participation in organized political and favorable movements there was great progress. Expansion of suffrage and the creation of mass political parties, trade unions and other social organizations to give more(prenominal) opportunities to influence the insurance policy of the state to achieve their demands. That mass hurt social egalitarian and labor parties by and by the war allowed them to adopt an important place in the political life of many countries.\nThe transition from war to peace turn out painful and time-consuming process for both countries winners and losers. War sacked many countries and exacerbated social problems, destroyed economic and political system that existed in Europe before the war.\nThus, in a look paper attempts to organize materials of various historical sources about the record of the First World War, its main stages, what furbish up has this bloody war, as its results are influenced by the development of mass political movements in individual countries.\nIn conclusion I would like to declare that every war is inherently nonmeaningful and inhumane. Any conflicts should be resolved by peaceful means, it is inconceivable to for the sake of this or that person, people, and even bloodletting race people.'